[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
convert-ly rule for beams
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
convert-ly rule for beams |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:03:22 +0200 |
Hey all,
Before I push the beam slope patch, I wanted to touch base regarding convert-ly
rules for it so I avoid the problems I ran into with flags.
In this patch, I am eliminating several Scheme callbacks (but not the
properties for which these callbacks are used - namely, the positions property
for Beam).
Would the elimination of callback functions count as a change in input syntax?
My crude understanding of what "syntax" means says no, but I'd rather err on
the side of caution. If a rule needs to be written, I'll write a NOT_SMART
rule for the defunct functions.
Cheers,
MS
- convert-ly rule for beams,
address@hidden <=