[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: convert-ly rule for beams
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: convert-ly rule for beams |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:29:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:54:56AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:11 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> changes.tely? Or is that too user-level?
>
> changes.tely makes sense - I doubt any developer will have any doubt about
> where these functions went, as they exist in the same part of
> beam-quanting.cc but are not callbacks anymore.
changes.tely sounds like the right place. My rule of thumb is
"what problems can I blame on the user without feeling guilty",
and if somebody is messing around with scheme callbacks but
doesn't check changes.tely and complaints about their code not
working any more, I wouldn't feel bad about telling them to get
lost.
(by contrast, if somebody doesn't touch scheme stuff, doesn't read
changes.tely, runs convert-ly, ends up with a broken score, and
complains about it, I *would* feel guilty about telling them to
get lost.)
Cheers,
- Graham