[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilydev 2.0
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: lilydev 2.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:38:09 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:35:36AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I could probably do it again. Maybe Debian would be better base so it
> wouldn't need upgrading as much?
This upgrade is to match our changing development requirements,
i.e. fontforge 20110222 --enable-double, astyle 2.02, having the
user profile set up with $LILYPOND_GIT, etc. Not because of any
problems in ubuntu 10.04 itself.
oh wait, were you referring to Ubuntu's frequent security updates?
Well, I suppose that Debian probably has fewer... but I'd rather
stay with ubuntu. All our windows contributors are accustomed to
it by now, and there's plenty of newbie-oriented help online for
ubuntu.
Cheers,
- Graham
- lilydev 2.0, Graham Percival, 2011/12/09
- Re: lilydev 2.0, Jonathan Kulp, 2011/12/09
- Re: lilydev 2.0,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: lilydev 2.0, James, 2011/12/10
- Re: lilydev 2.0, Jonathan Kulp, 2011/12/10
- Re: lilydev 2.0, Jonathan Kulp, 2011/12/10
- Re: lilydev 2.0, James, 2011/12/10
- Re: lilydev 2.0, Jonathan Kulp, 2011/12/10
- Re: lilydev 2.0, James, 2011/12/11
- Re: lilydev 2.0, James, 2011/12/11
- Re: lilydev 2.0, Graham Percival, 2011/12/11
- Re: lilydev 2.0, James, 2011/12/11
- Re: lilydev 2.0, Jonathan Kulp, 2011/12/11