Re: Labelling of patches

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:15:43PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> 
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On the tracker, we use labels to categorise issues.  Is there any reason we 
> > shouldn't use a specific label just for patches ("Patch")?  This will make 
> > it clearer to the Bug Squad how to verify - those labelled patch are 
> > verified with a commitish, those without by checking the result.
> 
> What do you consider a "patch"?  Your terminology is not clear to me. 

Dunno about Phil, but I'd define it as "an issue which has no Tiny
example".

Cheers,
- Graham