Re: Labelling of patches

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: Labelling of patches


> On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On the tracker, we use labels to categorise issues.  Is there any reason 
> > we shouldn't use a specific label just for patches ("Patch")?  This will 
> > make it clearer to the Bug Squad how to verify - those labelled patch are 
> > verified with a commitish, those without by checking the result.
>
> What do you consider a "patch"?  Your terminology is not clear to me.
>
> Carl


I would be happy with "an issue which has been raised by pushing a patch to 
Rietveld with git-cl"; an alternative would be an issue where the only 
simple way to verify is to check the commitish has been pushed - but for 
simplicity would go with the first.

--
Phil Holmes