Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056)

[janek . lilypond]

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1350
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1350: partial measure @emph{before}
the start of the next full measure.
What about
"where @address@hidden is the duration that will be added before
the first measure.  In other words, it is the @emph{remaining} length of
the partial measure @emph{before} the start of the first full measure."
?

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1353
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1353: \time 6/8
On 2012/01/09 05:08:58, Graham Percival wrote:
> huh?!  why is this easier to understand than \partial 4 ?

+1

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1355
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1355: e8 | a4 c8 b[ c b] |
On 2012/01/09 05:08:58, Graham Percival wrote:
> what on earth does manual beaming have to do with a \partial?  How
does that
> improve this example?

+1

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1358
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1358: The partial @var{duration}
can be any value less than a full measure:
I'm not sure about "partial duration" thing.

But i like the "value" part.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1363
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1363: r4 e8 | a4 c8 b[ c b] |
i think original example was better because it showed use of 8*3
construct.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/