Re: Typo fixes (issue 5622049)

[pkx166h]

On 2012/02/02 19:14:57, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Too bad I only reviewed the "unpure-pure containers" documentation
(issue 2040)
> after it was committed.

Pavel, I'm ok with the itely files, and I can see that the cc and scm
files are in comments only (I assume you are doing some kind of manual
checking here), I don't think we need to put this kind of typo patch on
a countdown and we could push this 'as is' once the checks were made.
I'm happy if the devs don't mind the scm and cc files being touched like
this. I cannot speak for the translations though.

james


http://codereview.appspot.com/5622049/