[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected. |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:54:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:45:05PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > If we are serious about doing this next year, I think we need to develop a
> > stronger website around GSOC. As I read the requirements, it appears to
> > me that to be competitive we need to have a more fully-developed
> > infrastructure.
>
> I agree. As i was in the middle of the whole thing, i suppose i don't
> have enough perspective;
FWIW, I think it's something like 20% of project applications are
accepted.
> the only thing that comes to my mind at the
> moment is that our CG is a bit messy and he patch procedures should be
> more automated and unified, and the whole process described more
> clearly than it is now.
> Can you share your thoughts?
That's pretty much it. I'd split it into a few separate tasks,
though:
1. what are the pain points involved in experienced developers
contributing to lilypond? Fix those first -- making it a more fun
process might keep experienced developers around longer, but also
anything that bugs us is likely to annoy or confuse new
contributors.
git-cl is the biggest contender here, along with patch management
in general.
2. does the CG accurately reflect our current process? hint: it
doesn't. The "quick start" description is flawed (there's
something off about the printed stuff about lily-git.tcl), and
even chapter 1 is inaccurate (it suggests that we have a
"mentoring" program, which frankly we don't).
3. once the above two points are nailed down -- which will likely
take 3-6 months -- *then* I think it's worth inviting/begging
somebody new to start contributing as a programmer, *with* a
dedicated mentor who will specifically find+fix pain points in
that process.
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > It might be good to wait a week to see what projects were
> > accepted,
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2012 ?
Somebody on another venue pointed out that it'll take a few hours
or days for the complete list to show up; at that time, it was
only showing the first 30% of accepted projects.
- Graham