[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR is now on 2.14
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR is now on 2.14 |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:33:07 +0200 |
Am 3. April 2012 16:30 schrieb Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> My understanding is that, once a correct snippet is in the LSR, it should be
> deleted from snippets/new. What will then happen is that I will grab an
> updated tarball of the snippets tagged with the docs tag and run makelsr.
> These will then all be imported into snippets (not snippets/new). If there
> is a snippet in snippets/new it over-writes the one from the tarball.
>
> So the next task is to check whether there are any snippets in snippets/new
> that should not be deleted - these would be ones that only run on 2.15.x.
I'm not sure how to continue:
I just downloaded the source-tarball, lilypond-2.15.35.tar.gz and
sorted the 2.14-snippets from *Documentation/snippets/new/"
I noticed that these snippets are not completely identical to the ones
from Savannah:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=Documentation/snippets/new;h=cac0bba81f655a2666049823e7d21ec51bcd73cd;hb=2055f35c47a045a50a01ff4dba8524322cfc3b48
What to do?
-Harm
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, (continued)
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/04/01
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/04/02
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/02
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, David Nalesnik, 2012/04/02
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/03
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/04/03
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, David Nalesnik, 2012/04/03
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/04/03
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/03
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Thomas Morley, 2012/04/03
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/04
Re: LSR is now on 2.14, Phil Holmes, 2012/04/04