[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
|
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 May 2012 02:55:14 +0000 |
On May 5, 2012, at 8:16 PM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> But what about <>\footnote: that does not have this problem.
>
> In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
> in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
What a great idea! No notes generated; the duration doesn't change.
Does <> take any time?
Thanks,
Carl