Re: Substitute for s1*0

[Werner LEMBERG]

> There is a drawback, though.  q is changed.  Now q is implemented as
> <> but with the current duration on it.  Which would mean that the
> total moment of
> 
> { c4 <> q }
> 
> would likely change when q gets expanded.  While <c> _is_ considered
> for q for consistency's sake, perhaps <> should be made to leave it
> alone.

Sounds good.


    Werner