[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Server at Paris VIII
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Server at Paris VIII |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2012 19:05:48 +0200 |
On 14 mai 2012, at 18:28, David Kastrup wrote:
> "address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> For me, it is faster to write a lot of kludgy code, see what it
>> breaks, and then write good code [1] rather than trying to write good
>> code from the get-go. So cheap regtests definitely help.
>
> That sounds uncomfortably like: "It's ok to design stuff above one's
> head since we have a procedure for finding most of the easy to diagnose
> bugs."
>
> There is a rule of thumb: you can debug code at about half the
> complexity that you can design it. If you design at the limits of your
> capacities, you will not be able to debug your code.
>
> And this sounds like you think we have mechanisms helping with designing
> code beyond the limits of your capacities.
>
No, I mean that my capacities are not static but dynamic and only grow when I
see how things work, which often times comes from seeing how things fail.
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, (continued)
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, Graham Percival, 2012/05/13
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, David Kastrup, 2012/05/13
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, Phil Holmes, 2012/05/13
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, John Mandereau, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, Graham Percival, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, address@hidden, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, James, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, address@hidden, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, David Kastrup, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII,
address@hidden <=
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, Colin Campbell, 2012/05/14
- Re: Server at Paris VIII, James, 2012/05/15