[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final)
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final) |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:14:35 +0100 |
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:05 AM
> Not much discussion after the mid-way point. I'm not certain if
> this means that everybody agrees, or they just think I'm
> completely wrong and it's not worth even discussing it (as
> happened with the first proposal for stable release handling).
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_4.html
>
>
> ** Summary
>
> Let’s start stabilizing portions of the LilyPond input syntax. We
> will guarantee that selected elements of the syntax will not
> change (even with convert-ly) during the 3.x releases. This will
> be a slow process, and the first phase (2012) will not even cover
> the entire “single staff notation” section in the tutorial.
I'm happy with this proposal.
Trevor
- Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), (continued)
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), Bernard Hurley, 2012/08/09
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/09
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/08/10
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final), David Kastrup, 2012/08/10
Re: GOP2-3 - GLISS (final),
Trevor Daniels <=