[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052) |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 00:15:48 +0200 |
2012/9/30 <address@hidden>:
> On 2012/09/30 19:44:49, marc wrote:
>>
>> Am 30.09.2012 11:02, schrieb address@hidden:
>> > [...]
>> > First, the define-public is asking for trouble. You are exposing an
>> > internal Scheme data structure to users and make it overwritable by
>
> the
>>
>> > user. If the user follows this invitation, the effects will bleed
>
> over
>>
>> > from session to session. Never do that.
>> Ok.
>
>
> No, it's not ok. Hold your horses, this is another case too stupid for
> documenting and walking people through. Give me two days, and then you
> replace your define-public for the alists with define-session, and
> that's it. The rest of the code stays as it is.
>
> I'll make define-session do everything that is needed.
>
That would be very nice.
I can think of several functions/definitions currently destructively
changing internal Scheme data structures.
Perhaps they would work as expected then.
-Harm
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052), (continued)
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/09/29
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/09/29
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052), dak, 2012/09/30
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052), dak, 2012/09/30
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052), dak, 2012/09/30
- Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052),
Thomas Morley <=