|
| From: | graham |
| Subject: | Re: Provide \hide and \no functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048) |
| Date: | Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:23:55 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/diff/8001/ly/music-functions-init.ly File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/diff/8001/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode649 ly/music-functions-init.ly:649: no = why not use "omit" instead of "no" ? I think that "omit" is more specific; "no" is a quite general word and I don't think it makes sense here. https://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |