lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patchy email from PhilH


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:55:43 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:11 PM
> Subject: Patchy email from PhilH
>
>
>> Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92
>>
>> Merged staging, now at: c9d806f28ab690c3f210e14153c6bd31d506588e
>>
>> Success: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
>>
>> Success: ../configure --disable-optimising
>>
>> Success: nice make clean -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>
>> Success: nice make -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>
>> Success: nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>
>> *** FAILED BUILD ***
>>
>> nice make doc -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>
>> Previous good commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92
>>
>> Current broken commit: c9d806f28ab690c3f210e14153c6bd31d506588e
>
> This is the error:
>
> Processing
> /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly'
> Parsing...
> /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly:144:7:
> error: wrong type for argument 1.  Expecting list, found "Slur"
> \shape
>       Slur #'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly:144:12:
> error: wrong type for argument 2.  Expecting string or music, found
> ((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> \shape Slur
>            #'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> Interpreting music...
>
> [snip]
>
> fatal error: failed files: "61/lily-1564b6f0.ly"
>
> I presume 220f439edbd95266113248a984ebe6c4b97dcf14 is the culprit.

Huh.  This should have been caught by running convert-ly and I have no
idea why it didn't.  I'll back the shape change out of staging (rebasing
the other commits in the process) and investigate what went wrong here.

It is quite strange since a number of very similar lines converted just
fine.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]