Re: Patchy email from PhilH

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Cc: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:11 PM
> > Subject: Patchy email from PhilH
> >
> >
> > > Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92
> > >
> > > Merged staging, now at: c9d806f28ab690c3f210e14153c6bd31d506588e
> > >
> > > Success: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
> > >
> > > Success: ../configure --disable-optimising
> > >
> > > Success: nice make clean -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
> > >
> > > Success: nice make -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
> > >
> > > Success: nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
> > >
> > > *** FAILED BUILD ***
> > >
> > > nice make doc -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
> > >
> > > Previous good commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92
> > >
> > > Current broken commit: c9d806f28ab690c3f210e14153c6bd31d506588e
> >
> > This is the error:
> >
> > Processing
> > /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly'
> > Parsing...
> > /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly:144:7:
> > error: wrong type for argument 1.  Expecting list, found "Slur"
> > \shape
> >       Slur #'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> > /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly:144:12:
> > error: wrong type for argument 2.  Expecting string or music, found
> > ((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> > \shape Slur
> >            #'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> > Interpreting music...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > fatal error: failed files: "61/lily-1564b6f0.ly"
> >
> > I presume 220f439edbd95266113248a984ebe6c4b97dcf14 is the culprit.
>
> Huh.  This should have been caught by running convert-ly and I have no
> idea why it didn't.  I'll back the shape change out of staging (rebasing
> the other commits in the process) and investigate what went wrong here.
>
> It is quite strange since a number of very similar lines converted just
> fine.
>
> --
> David Kastrup


Do you need any more info on the identity of the failing file?

--
Phil Holmes