[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:26:20 +0200 (CEST) |
> On the other hand, things like \overrideProperty can only have one
> interface or the other, and "put a single dotted symbol list here to
> specify the path" with no alternative readings is dead simple and
> straightforward. And starting with version 2.19, or at the latest
> 2.21, I would want to remove the compatibility mode which is really
> complicating things both in the parser as well as conceptually.
Using the dotted form only in the future is fine for me.
Werner
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, (continued)
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Keith OHara, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Keith OHara, 2012/10/13
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/13
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/12