[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:30:42 +0200 (CEST) |
> However, one could change the current
> \tweak Accidental.color into
> \grob Accidental \tweak color ...
> and similarly for other tweaks: \grob name would just take the next
> music element, take a look at the last applied tweak and make it
> specific to one grob type. Better names welcome. It would be used
> for making a \tweak more specific. That would get rid of the \tweak
> anomaly and also provide the "directed tweak" interface for
> \footnote.
Sounds interesting. Could you show an `bigger' example how it would
look like? And \grob is an excellent name, I think.
Werner
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, (continued)
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Keith OHara, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, David Kastrup, 2012/10/18
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/19
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/12
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Keith OHara, 2012/10/13
- Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/13
Re: Context.Grob considered as symbol list, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/12