Re: svg output

[David Kastrup]

Federico Bruni <address@hidden> writes:

> 2012/10/23 Joram Berger <address@hidden>:
>> Ok, I've overlooked that.
>> Btw: SVG output is really nice!
>
> I agree.
> Personally, I'd love to see it used in the documentation. I wonder if
> it's possible to build the documentation using SVGs instead of PNGs..
> The documentation would be lighter, faster when browsed online and it
> would be possible to immagine advanced features (e.g. point-and-click
> from image to source through some javascript).
>
> Possible cons:
> - browser compatibility (sensible persons care for it, but I'm not
> sensible... especially when it's about _that_ browser)
> - output bugs in SVG? I have no idea if here's any, but this would be
> the most serious drawback I can think of

Texinfo does not support SVG as far as I know.  And neither do typical
info readers like Emacs if I remember correctly.

-- 
David Kastrup