Re: Issue 2917: Extend \keepWithTag to allow multiple tags (issue 6744070)

[pkx166h]

On 2012/10/24 10:07:25, dak wrote:
> On 2012/10/24 09:58:12, janek wrote:
> > LGTM
> >
> > shall the tracker issues "write doc for this"

> It is not as much "write doc for this" as the function itself has its
docs
> updated.  It is more "update the existing docs in the manual to
reflect the
> change".

> > and "add a regtest for this" be
> > added now or after this patch is pushed?
> > (my concern is to make sure that we won't forget)

> I am not planning on working on this myself but that does not preclude
someone
> else from submitting the respective parts which I would then
incorporate into
> the patch.  So I would lean towards waiting with creating the
doc/regtest issues
> until the patch is indeed being pushed.

NR Doc tracker is here

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2922

I think someone who knows better than I ought to make the regression
test.

James

https://codereview.appspot.com/6744070/