Re: Scheme indentation

[Marc Hohl]

Am 30.10.2012 15:10, schrieb address@hidden:
> On 30 oct. 2012, at 08:53, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > several weeks ago, Graham was about to run the scheme indentation
> > script on the sources – I asked him to wait until my bar line
> > project has finished in order to make *my* life easier ;-)
> >
> > Now I'd like to do the reformatting work – should this go through
> > Rietveld? It is an automatic task, but just to be sure I don't
> > break anything, I think I feel safer with Rietveld. Are there any
> > big changes planned on the scheme side of LilyPond, which would
> > collide with the formatting issue?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Marc
> I'd put it through the countdown just in case.
> I don't have any outstanding patches that this'd get in the way of.
Hello all,

my strategy seems to fail: the patch is too big for being tested with patchy
through rietveld, so I sent it to James. It is about 1,5 megs, and 
applying failed
because meanwhile David had pushed the outstanding measure_counter_engraver
patch.
So I could rebase/make a patch/mail to James/wait for approval/...

On the other hand: are there any objections to
a) run the script over all files in scm/
b) do a 'make && make test && make doc'
c) push the result (if b succeeds) directly to staging?

Regards,

Marc