Re: Doc: new syntax for \tweak, \override (2936) (issue 6852052)

[tdanielsmusic]

On 2012/11/24 06:22:43, dak wrote:
> On 2012/11/23 23:51:13, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> >

https://codereview.appspot.com/6852052/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
> > File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
> >
> >

https://codereview.appspot.com/6852052/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode1918
> > Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely:1918: (The syntax
used prior to
> > Release 2.17.6 was
> > On 2012/11/23 22:05:47, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > I don't think we should be talking about deprecated syntax;
otherwise we
> could
> > > end up with tons of side comments.  The documentation is large
enough as it
> > is.
> > > We should keep "used prior" material in Changes.
> >
> > I agree in general, but the point is both forms of the
> > syntax are still valid and so should be documented.

> I'm with Graham on this.  The extension manual may talk about the
equivalence of
> symbol lists in Scheme and LilyPond, but the whole point of the
exercise was to
> remove a complication.

OK, I don't feel too strongly about this, and I'm
out-voted.  Revised patch-set on its way.

Trevor


https://codereview.appspot.com/6852052/