|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Website questions: Manual->Web |
Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:20:20 -0000 |
To: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>Cc: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>; "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>; "LilyPond Development Team" <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:04 AM Subject: Re: Website questions: Manual->Web
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:I _think_ the odd place of "web" in the manuals hierarchy is down to it being the only part of the documentation that built using "make website" - it has something of a split personality between being part of the documentation and the website.No, there's three separate issues here. - lilypond.org/web/ : the old websiteWhat is this old stuff good for?Confusing search engines into misleading people there seems to be its main purpose nowadays. It's not totally clear whether it has other functions at the moment that could disrupt the regular operations when removed. -- David Kastrup
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1272 --Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |