|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: Add "Editing" page/node (issue 60530047) |
Date: | Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:01:38 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 07.02.2014 23:32, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 07.02.2014 22:24, schrieb Janek Warchoł:Hi, 2014-02-07 Urs Liska <address@hidden>:At http://www.openlilylib.org/lilyweb/editing.html you can see the actual page _with_ the new image (in order to compile locally you'd have to pull from lilypond-extra).My comments: I'd change "generic editor" to "text editor". "generic" is a needlessly complicated word, it will just scare people.Any other opinions on that? I wouldn't object to Janek's reasoning, but am slightly reluctant to go through the process if nobody else thinks the same.
I support Janek's proposal, "text editor" sounds better.
"and maybe errors through typographic means" -> i had to read it 3 times to understand what you mean.OK, I'll review that.
You are referring to "structure of the input file" in that sentence – misspelled commands should not be part of it, so IMHO error
highlightning – while being very convenient – does not belong to the structure and its representation within an editor window. Marc
best, j_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |