Re: Next buld

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Next buld
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> 2.19.3 or 2.18.1?
>>
>> Time flies.  When were you planning to start the build?  At the current
>> point of time, the stable branch does not have everything it should.  I
>> can try managing until tomorrow.
>>
>> -- 
>> David Kastrup
>
>
> OK - I've checked the stable/2.18 branch with make, make doc, make
> test. One minor change was needed to get it to compile,

Mea culpa.  That was actually the version header in a regtest for, well,
a not-really-bugfix change relaxing one corner of \score syntax that
kept annoying people.

> I'll kick GUB off in about 30 minutes, but will actually do the upload
> tomorrow morning and the announcement tomorrow afternoon.

Fine with me.  I had postponed the large-scale announcements of 2.18.0
in order to not get reports by everyone trying to use convert-ly without
further options for upgrading to 2.18.0 and only getting 2.17.97.  So
the big fanfare will get blown a bit late.

-- 
David Kastrup