[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014 |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:16:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 19.02.2014 18:41, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>> There is a three-month limit as far as I can see. There seems little
>> point in proposing stuff that a student cannot realistically be expected
>> to wrap his head around in the given time frame. The GUILEv2 migration
>> is a project where you need to build and work with a rather confined set
>> of expertise and then continue applying it until you get to the end.
>>
>> I think that has a reasonable chance of fitting in the time slot without
>> previous heavy exposure to the LilyPond code base. It's not a given,
>> but it has a reasonable chance. With something vague and complicated
>> like "tie crusade" or "slur formatting", I don't see anything happening
>> with a tangible result.
>
> That may well be true, and my suggestion wasn't too educated.
> But I had the impression that at least the Tie project was of a
> reasonable size,
What _is_ the "tie project"? There are lists of ugly ties. That's not
a project.
> and equipped with enough pre-research.
I don't see anything that would serve as either a direction or a
starting point.
--
David Kastrup
- GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, Urs Liska, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Urs Liska, 2014/02/20