[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014 |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:56:37 +0100 |
2014-02-19 18:41 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>> Janek's Tie Crusade?
>
> There is a three-month limit as far as I can see. There seems little
> point in proposing stuff that a student cannot realistically be expected
> to wrap his head around in the given time frame.
> [...] With something vague and complicated
> like "tie crusade" or "slur formatting", I don't see anything happening
> with a tangible result.
I estimate the time needed for fixing tie formatting to be 120-200
hours (for someone roughly familiar with LilyPond codebase). When we
take into account that such estimates usually are 50% off, and add 100
hours for getting familiar with the codebase, we get 400 hours = 10
weeks of full-time work. Seems to be a reasonable fit for GSoC time
frame.
2014-02-19 20:16 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>> That may well be true, and my suggestion wasn't too educated.
>> But I had the impression that at least the Tie project was of a
>> reasonable size,
>
> What _is_ the "tie project"? There are lists of ugly ties. That's not
> a project.
>
>> and equipped with enough pre-research.
>
> I don't see anything that would serve as either a direction or a
> starting point.
You know what? It's VERY frustrating to spend 200+ hours (during the
last 2 years) collecting examples and researching tie formatting, and
then see someone - especially an involved developer like you - say
"what tie project? what research? i don't see any".
And i didn't only collect lists of ugly ties. I already have a spec
draft, and a pretty good idea how to approach the issue.
Several times i have offered to share my research. Usually it seemed
that noone cared to see it.
So, I am really angry because of what you said and how you said it.
j
- GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, Urs Liska, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Urs Liska, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/22