[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2014
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2014 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:20:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 20.02.2014 10:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Well, let's put this in perspective. This was a call on the GNU
>> maintainer list for proposing projects within 12 hours. That basically
>> requires turnkey-ready proposals, and Urs volunteered what basically
>> amounted to buzzwords referring to ongoing work that had no obvious
>> publicly available roadmap or shape. By the time the flames dies down,
>> there were few hours left anyway.
>
> So what is missing info: Did you in the end propose the Guile update
> project?
I proposed that right away, I think even before asking on the developer
list for further ideas. I don't think there would have been a problem
with putting out more than one proposal, but since we are potentially
competing with other GNU projects for resources, I would not have wanted
to propose something that I did not feel reasonably confident about.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: GSoC 2014, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/19
- Re: [SPAM] Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/19
- Re: GSoC 2014, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, David Kastrup, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014, Urs Liska, 2014/02/20
- Re: GSoC 2014,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GSoC 2014, Janek Warchoł, 2014/02/22