Re: Compound time signature style

[Marc Hohl]

Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected the 
> > time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable?  For 
> > example,
> >
> >     2 + 3                2 + 3   4
> >     ----- + C     vs.    ----- + -
> >       4                    4     4
>
> Undesirable in my book.

I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, so
either

2 + 3   4
----- + -
  8     4

in the case where there is no common denomiator,
or

2 + 3 + 4
---------
    4

in the upper case.

I'd rather not use the C symbol in these cases.

Marc