[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compound time signature style
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Compound time signature style |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:55:25 -0500 |
>>> 2 + 3 2 + 3 4
>>> ----- + C vs. ----- + -
>>> 4 4 4
>>
>> Undesirable in my book.
>>
>
> I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, so
> either
[…]
>
> I'd rather not use the C symbol in these cases.
Bad example. What if it were something like
6
- + ¢
8
Still no? You don’t have to answer. I’ll leave the output numeric and add
cases with 2/2 and 4/4 to the regression tests.
—
Dan
- Compound time signature style, Dan Eble, 2014/11/03
- Re: Compound time signature style, Marc Hohl, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Marc Hohl, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Marc Hohl, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/04
- Re: Compound time signature style, Dan Eble, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, Hans Aberg, 2014/11/06
- Re: Compound time signature style, David Kastrup, 2014/11/06