Re: Chord pipelines

[Carl Sorensen]

On 11/22/14 9:35 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:

>
>Hi together,
>
>I am currently contemplating our chord support and it appears rather
>badly modularized to me.
>
><SNIP>
>
>This is one area where the existing possibilities for customization
>(like the chord naming functions in context properties) are of such
>limited usefulness that I would consider incompatibility with code using
>these hooks an acceptable price to pay for a sane and versatile
>redesign.

I totally agree that a sane and versatile redesign of LilyPond's Chords
system would be helpful.  Code incompatibility would be fine if the
resulting system were cleaner, less complicated, and more extensible.

Thanks,

Carl