[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings
From: |
david . nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:51:06 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly
File input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly#newcode15
input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly:15: \override
Tie.minimum-length-after-break = 20
On 2015/02/05 22:31:33, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I'd use \once \override ...
Though, that's only me
I'm happy to change that. Would you use \once with the other overrides
in the file?
https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly#newcode16
input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly:16: a1~
On 2015/02/05 22:31:34, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I assume it works for chords as well.
I'd add at least one example with chords and Tie or Glissando
Instead of the one regtest, I could have two.
The first would show a tied chord, and I would show how you can use
'minimum-length and 'minimum-length-after-break in various combinations.
The second would be this regtest, and I could take out the tie example
so there's no overlap with the other test.
What do you think?
https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2015/02/05
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden),
david . nalesnik <=
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2015/02/05
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2015/02/06
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), david . nalesnik, 2015/02/06
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), david . nalesnik, 2015/02/06
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2015/02/06
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), david . nalesnik, 2015/02/08
- Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2015/02/09