Re: Clean up inconsistencies in engraver-init.ly and performer-init.ly (issue 199460043 by address@hidden)

[c_sorensen]

On 2015/02/18 18:57:21, dak wrote:
> On 2015/02/18 18:53:03, c_sorensen wrote:
> > On 2015/02/09 23:46:45, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'd happily do it, though, why alpabetically? And why only for the
lines
> with
> > > \accept, could be done for the context-defs as well.
> > > And it's also thinkable to sort it following context-hierarchy:
first
> > > bottom-contexts like Voice, then Staff up to Score and Global.
> > > Or vice versa...
> > >
> > > What do others think?
> >
> > Alphabetically.  The only reason for sorting them is to make it easy
for a
> human
> > to find.  Context-hierarchy requires me to know the context
hierarchy, which I
> > likely don't know fully.  Alphabetically is trivial for me to look.
> >
> > Carl

> Alphabetically is not feasible for context defs since several context
defs are
> based on previously defined context defs that are not preceding them
in
> alphabet.

So /accepts sorted alphabetically, and context defs sorted in definition
order?

Carl


https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/