[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:36:05 +0200 (CEST) |
>> What about defining anchors? Having a slur ending in a different
>> voice makes the `(' ... `)' notation extremely hard to read (if it
>> works at all). Instead, I can imagine something like the following
>> to get a slur between voiceA and voiceB, starting on the second and
>> ending on the fourth quarter beat.
>>
>> in voiceA: c4
>> \connect #'Slur #'voiceB #'myanchor
>> d e f
>>
>> in voiceB: e4 f g
>> \anchor #'myanchor
>> a
>
> That's not going to work out when you have the same sort of
> construct again and again and again. You don't want to invent a new
> name twice a measure.
Right. In case you've missed it, I made another, probably better
suggestion.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-03/msg00300.html
Werner
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, (continued)
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, David Kastrup, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Urs Liska, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Urs Liska, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Urs Liska, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Urs Liska, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, David Kastrup, 2015/03/30
- Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Dan Eble, 2015/03/29
Re: Reasons for cross-voice limitations?, Michael Rivers, 2015/03/31