Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by address@hidden)

[lilyliska]

Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already.

However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th notes
ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the second
one only one beam.

Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth note's
worth there should be only one beam, even when that total is itself
subdivided into two sixteenth notes. (Presumably that logic should be
propagated to the situation of (nested shorter notes): when 16 64th
notes are subdivided by 32ths the divisions should should have the
following number of beams: 3-2-3-1-3-2-3.

https://codereview.appspot.com/226700043/