[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by addres
From: |
Benkő Pál |
Subject: |
Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Apr 2015 13:54:00 +0200 |
2015-04-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 <address@hidden>:
> Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already.
>
> However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th notes
> ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the second
> one only one beam.
>
> Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth note's
> worth there should be only one beam, even when that total is itself
> subdivided into two sixteenth notes. (Presumably that logic should be
> propagated to the situation of (nested shorter notes): when 16 64th
> notes are subdivided by 32ths the divisions should should have the
> following number of beams: 3-2-3-1-3-2-3.
could you formulate this more generally?
e.g. what to do with 12 32th notes?
p
Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by address@hidden), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2015/04/25
Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by address@hidden), lilyliska, 2015/04/25
Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by address@hidden), lilyliska, 2015/04/25