|
From: | Simon Albrecht |
Subject: | Re: LM 2.4.1: More accurate description of variable naming rules (issue 280560043 by address@hidden) |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jan 2016 00:21:47 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
On 29.12.2015 23:01, address@hidden wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/280560043/diff/20001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itelyFile Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right):https://codereview.appspot.com/280560043/diff/20001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely#newcode1347Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely:1347: I'd probably concur with this for the Learning Manual. Just keep it simple, then use an @ref to the Notation and explain it more detail there.
Thanks for your opinions. I’ve made a new attempt now; unfortunately, after some juggling around with git operations I can’t reliably handle yet I had to open a new issue for review: <https://codereview.appspot.com/284070043/>. I’m closing this one.
Best, Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |