Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

[Hans Åberg]

> On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:00, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>>> Well, it certainly is not desirable when the documentation is missing
>>> but the GPL demands providing the source code and associated scripts for
>>> everything you distribute.
>> 
>> I think it suffices to have it provided, not necessarily in a specific
>> main distribution. These days, Internet should suffice.
> 
> It doesn't matter what you think when the conditions are spelled out
> clearly in the GPL.

It doesn't matter what you think it says if you don't interpret it properly.

>> MacPorts admits distinguishing between dependencies for build and the
>> binary installer, so the latter can have just the docs without the
>> stuff required to build it.
> 
> Unless I am mistaken we are talking about the documentation being
> completely absent.  Which is legitimate but unfortunate.

There are various possibilities.