Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

[Hans Åberg]

> On 14 Mar 2019, at 18:25, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> The passage in question reads
> 
>  6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
> 
>  You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms
> of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the
> machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License,
> in one of these ways:

So possibly you have an objection distributing the PDF without its source code 
under those forms together with the source code of the program!?

>>>> MacPorts admits distinguishing between dependencies for build and
>>>> the binary installer, so the latter can have just the docs without
>>>> the stuff required to build it.
>>> 
>>> Unless I am mistaken we are talking about the documentation being
>>> completely absent.  Which is legitimate but unfortunate.
>> 
>> There are various possibilities.
> 
> Usually an applicable truism even if I have no clue what you are
> referring to here.

MacPorts admits making an independent binary installer from the distribution 
and one can choose what dependencies should be included, and also its install 
location.