[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stabl
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:13:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:
> On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
>> Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.
>> Does that seem the best way forward?
>
> In rsync-lily-doc.py we have:
>
> system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links
> --delay-updates --delete --delete-after --stats --progress -pgorltvu
> -e ssh . %s/%s/' % (options.destination, branch_dir))
>
> In rsync-test.py we have:
>
> system ('rsync --hard-links --delay-updates --delete --delete-after
> --stats --progress -pgorltvu -e ssh . %s/%s/' % (options.destination,
> target))
>
> Group and ownership are preserved here. But "preserved" means that the
> numeric group / user id is preserved, not the literal name mapped to
> the GID/UID on the two systems.
Sure about that?
-o, --owner
This option causes rsync to set the owner of the
destination file to be the same as the source file, but
only if the receiving rsync is being run as the
super-user (see also the --super and --fake-super
options). Without this option, the owner of new and/or
transferred files are set to the invoking user on the
receiving side.
The preservation of ownership will associate matching
names by default, but may fall back to using the ID
number in some circumstances (see also the
--numeric-ids option for a full discussion).
-g, --group
This option causes rsync to set the group of the
destination file to be the same as the source file. If
the receiving program is not running as the super-user
(or if --no-super was specified), only groups that the
invoking user on the receiving side is a member of will
be preserved. Without this option, the group is set to
the default group of the invoking user on the receiving
side.
The preservation of group information will associate
matching names by default, but may fall back to using
the ID number in some circumstances (see also the
--numeric-ids option for a full discussion).
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], (continued)
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/20
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], David Kastrup, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Knut Petersen, 2019/03/21
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch],
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Karlin High, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], John Mandereau, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], Phil Holmes, 2019/03/23
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/03/22
- Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch], John Mandereau, 2019/03/20