|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] |
Date: | Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:17:05 -0000 |
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>Cc: "John Mandereau" <address@hidden>; "Lily devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:09 PMSubject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]
On typical UNIX-like systems these days, a user account beowulf has both a user id of beowulf and a group id of beowulf. This is not a necessity as much as a convention making some permission management easier. Typical utilities creating accounts follow that permission. It seems like on your system, the user "lilypond" (assuming it exists) does not have an accompanying group "lilypond".
I don't even have a username "lilypond". Don't think the VM I used to use does either. Not sure why it wants to change group to a non-existent entity. Does it copy the permissions (and memberships) to the remote server?
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |