Re: displayLilyMusic and guilev2

[Thomas Morley]

Am Sa., 8. Feb. 2020 um 23:59 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > one problem with guilev2 are anonymous procedures. Like how to get
> > nice output for
> >
> > \void
> > \displayLilyMusic \new Voice { \applyContext #(lambda (ctx) (display ctx)) 
> > b4 }
> >
> > An older lily-build out of e57c27dc14 with the patches from
> > guilev2-work on top and guile-2.0.14 returned:
> > \new Voice { \applyContext ##f b4 }
> > Which is suboptimal.
> >
> > A todays build out of c334743a6d and guile-2.2.6, selfcompiled out of
> > ~/guile-2.2 (my-guile-2-2-6)$ git log --oneline
> > 9a11be136 (HEAD -> my-guile-2-2-6, origin/stable-2.2)
> > 00-repl-server.test: don't use fixed path for socket
> > 5d2956497 Respect thread local fluid defaults
> > aa0bfa2f9 Fix peval bug that ignored excess args
> > fb7b873af web: Update comment regarding the 'tls-wrap' port wrapper.
> > edf5aea7a Fix non-deterministic crash in 'finalization_thread_proc'.
> > 659526d33 ports: 'scm_port_poll' honors "w" flags.
> > a69b567d9 (guile-2.2.6) build: Do not record LDFLAGS in .pc file.
> > 85de8637c (tag: v2.2.6) Bump version for Guile 2.2.6.
> > ...
> >
> > returns:
> > \new Voice { \applyContext #(lambda (ctx) (display ctx)) b4 }
> > which is nice again and the same as in 2.19.84 with guile-1.8
> >
> > Does anybody knows whether it's a guile- or lily-improvement?
>
> No idea.  It might be a different compilation option or environment or
> eval setting that is at work here because I have ostensibly also a 2.2.6
> and your commits on top of the tag don't look like they could make a
> difference.

To be sure, you still get:
\new Voice { \applyContext ##f b4 }
?

Cheers,
  Harm