Re: Naming question for get_property, set_property

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:17 PM David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> > the reason being that it is better if the source code looks like plain
> C++,
> > even though they might actually be macros that do advanced magic. Having
> > normal looking source code helps editors and tooling (astyle,
> clang-format)
> > make sensible decisions.
>
> get_property (pointer, "property")
> set_property (pointer, "property", value);
>
> would achieve that as well.  Doesn't look like a member function, but
> the thing looking like a member function also never actually was one.
>
>
Earlier you said:

"and for "reasons" I
need to know the type, so the call would become something akin to"

how does this work for the above?

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen