lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 56940


From: dak
Subject: Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 16:10:30 -0800

On 2020/02/22 23:56:23, hanwenn wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:29 AM <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/02/22 23:18:43, hanwenn wrote:
> > > On 2020/02/22 23:17:50, hanwenn wrote:
> > > > you were already potentially in a state where you have 3 jobs
each
> > spawning 3
> > > > lp-book invocations,
> > >
> > > whoops, I mean: 3 lp-book invocations spawning 3 lilypond
subprocesses
> > each, for
> > > 9 in total.
> >
> > Considering that I build with CPU_COUNT=9 make -j9 I am pretty sure
that
> > I'd have noticed if that were happening so far.  I may have a nice
> > number of cores (4) and memory considered plentiful (16GB) for a
laptop,
> > but 81 parallel instances of LilyPond would certainly bring this
system
> > to its knees.
> 
> In practice, this doesn't happen, because our build system doesn't
> parallelize all that well, and we don't have much large lp-book
> documents anyway

But this patch attempts to make it happen, right?

https://codereview.appspot.com/569400043/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]