lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 56940


From: hanwenn
Subject: Re: Use $(MAKE) instead of 'make' in lilypond-book regtests (issue 569400043 by address@hidden)
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 11:29:00 -0800

On 2020/02/23 00:10:31, dak wrote:
> On 2020/02/22 23:56:23, hanwenn wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:29 AM <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020/02/22 23:18:43, hanwenn wrote:
> > > > On 2020/02/22 23:17:50, hanwenn wrote:
> > > > > you were already potentially in a state where you have 3 jobs
each
> > > spawning 3
> > > > > lp-book invocations,
> > > >
> > > > whoops, I mean: 3 lp-book invocations spawning 3 lilypond
subprocesses
> > > each, for
> > > > 9 in total.
> > >
> > > Considering that I build with CPU_COUNT=9 make -j9 I am pretty
sure that
> > > I'd have noticed if that were happening so far.  I may have a nice
> > > number of cores (4) and memory considered plentiful (16GB) for a
laptop,
> > > but 81 parallel instances of LilyPond would certainly bring this
system
> > > to its knees.
> > 
> > In practice, this doesn't happen, because our build system doesn't
> > parallelize all that well, and we don't have much large lp-book
> > documents anyway
> 
> But this patch attempts to make it happen, right?

abandoning this for 
https://codereview.appspot.com/555360043/

https://codereview.appspot.com/569400043/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]