lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”)


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:18:56 +0200

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:11 PM David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
> <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Am Freitag, den 19.06.2020, 11:47 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:45 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> wrote:
> >> > Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 11:21 -0600 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> >> > > is it the difference between an output .ps file and an output .eps 
> >> > > file?
> >> >
> >> > No, broken.ps file is only the driver for Ghostscript:
> >> > mark /OutputFile (broken.pdf) (pdfwrite) finddevice putdeviceprops
> >> > setdevice (broken.eps) run
> >> >
> >> > Both ways use the same broken.eps file:
> >> > %!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-2.0
> >> >
> >> > Yes, it's empty except for that line.
> >>
> >> That doesn't look like an EPS file that LilyPond should be producing.
> >>
> >> Let me do some research today where that comes from.
> >
> > No, this is the only smallest possible EPS file that shows the problem.
> > I'm attaching the real file from LilyPond to this message, but the
> > important part is probably that it contains no graphical objects.
>
> That triggers some memory: this may not have anything to do with
> autorotation?  That GhostScript decides on landscape orientation
> unexpectedly or so?

Good sleuthing. AutoRotatePages is a device parameter, so it gets
overwritten by the defaults in the broken version.

Let me try what happens if we add it to the driver script.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]