Re: branching stable/2.22?

[Dan Eble]

On Sep 11, 2020, at 15:19, James Lowe <pkx166h@posteo.net> wrote:
> 
> On 11/09/2020 20:13, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>>  I consider this fundamental flaws.
>> I disagree. These flaws might be a bother for developers, but
>> branching stable/2.22 is about not having user-visible regressions of
>> lilypond itself, relative to 2.20, which has nothing to do with how
>> developers experience working on lilypond.
>> 
> I'm with Han-Wen on this.
> 
> PDF building has nothing whatsoever to do with what most users need. This is 
> the 'build' stuff that frankly can wait until we have fixed the 
> regressions/documentation of features.

I lean toward letting the people who want to freeze/stabilize/release get on 
with it.  I would hold back my \volta changes for the month or so that it takes 
to do this, work on related new features on my own, and contribute bug fixes as 
I find them.
— 
Dan