[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SMuFL name mapping update, 9 July
From: |
Karlin High |
Subject: |
Re: SMuFL name mapping update, 9 July |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jul 2021 09:21:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
On 7/9/2021 9:09 PM, Owen Lamb wrote:
I've dropped in the next few Emmentaler categories (Default Noteheads,
Special Noteheads, and Shape-note Noteheads), so feel free to give it a
look at https://wolfgangsta.github.io/emmentaler-bravura/. Please let me
know what you think, especially regarding the red "contentious" cells!
I looked over the list, focusing on the shape notes. Nothing stood out
to me as being wrong, although I have no skill for the font design
concerns here.
It looks like the majority of the red=contentious cells for shape notes
are in the Walker shapes. I am not aware there is a living music
tradition or community still using these or the Funk ones, as there is
for Aiken and Sacred Harp. The value of Walker and Funk shapes would
mainly be for reproducing historical works.
Therefore, I would say feel free to do whatever makes sense and results
in usable fonts. There is unlikely to be many "normal" users with
highly-specific concerns for Walker shapes. And if someone is doing a
labor-of-love scholarly historical reproduction of a Walker-heads work,
it is doubtful this project can foresee what they would care about
without having such an expert available at this point.
You are reaching a point where I am starting to go, "Eh, if Owen Lamb
studied and designed something for LilyPond fonts, it's probably fine."
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA