|
From: | Owen Lamb |
Subject: | Re: SMuFL name mapping update, 9 July |
Date: | Sat, 10 Jul 2021 16:33:39 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
Thanks for the suggestion, Hans!Unfortunately, I have next to zero experience actually designing new glyphs, so I'm not (yet?) the guy to ask about that. Right now, my number-one priority is making our existing font SMuFL-compliant and giving LilyPond SMuFL support, after which (I stress: I can make no promises) I *might* try my hand at expanding Emmentaler in a couple areas.
Owen On 7/10/2021 6:29 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
On 10 Jul 2021, at 04:09, Owen Lamb <owendlamb@gmail.com> wrote: A bit of news on the SMuFL front. I've dropped in the next few Emmentaler categories (Default Noteheads, Special Noteheads, and Shape-note Noteheads), so feel free to give it a look at https://wolfgangsta.github.io/emmentaler-bravura/. Please let me know what you think, especially regarding the red "contentious" cells!It would be nice with the Helmholtz-Ellis accidentals with one and two arrows up and down. They fill up the microtonal accidentals in E72 (and also E53), in addition to exact quartertones, which can be used with LilyPond. https://w3c.github.io/smufl/latest/tables/extended-helmholtz-ellis-accidentals-just-intonation.html There was a proposal, but was not realized. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2018-10/msg00097.html
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |